English

Finite time blowup for a supercritical defocusing nonlinear wave system

Analysis of PDEs 2017-01-25 v3

Abstract

We consider the global regularity problem for defocusing nonlinear wave systems u=(RmF)(u) \Box u = (\nabla_{{\bf R}^m} F)(u) on Minkowski spacetime R1+d{\bf R}^{1+d} with d'Alambertian :=t2+i=1dxi2\Box := -\partial_t^2 + \sum_{i=1}^d \partial_{x_i}^2, the field u:R1+dRmu: {\bf R}^{1+d} \to {\bf R}^m is vector-valued, and F:RmRF: {\bf R}^m \to {\bf R} is a smooth potential which is positive and homogeneous of order p+1p+1 outside of the unit ball, for some p>1p >1. This generalises the scalar defocusing nonlinear wave (NLW) equation, in which m=1m=1 and F(v)=1p+1vp+1F(v) = \frac{1}{p+1} |v|^{p+1}. It is well known that in the energy sub-critical and energy-critical cases when d2d \leq 2 or d3d \geq 3 and p1+4d2p \leq 1+\frac{4}{d-2}, one has global existence of smooth solutions (for dimensions d7d \leq 7 at least) from arbitrary smooth initial data u(0),tu(0)u(0), \partial_t u(0). In this paper we study the supercritical case where d=3d = 3 and p>5p > 5. We show that in this case, there exists smooth potential FF for some sufficiently large mm (in fact we can take m=40m=40), positive and homogeneous of order p+1p+1 outside of the unit ball, and a smooth choice of initial data u(0),tu(0)u(0), \partial_t u(0) for which the solution develops a finite time singularity. In fact the solution is discretely self-similar in a backwards light cone. The basic strategy is to first select the mass and energy densities of uu, then uu itself, and then finally design the potential FF in order to solve the required equation. The Nash embedding theorem is used in the second step, explaining the need to take mm relatively large.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1602.08059,
  title  = {Finite time blowup for a supercritical defocusing nonlinear wave system},
  author = {Terence Tao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.08059},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

32 pages, no figures. Submitted, Anal. PDE. Some further typos and incorrect exponents fixed, and the value of $m$ lowered

R2 v1 2026-06-22T12:58:00.773Z