English

Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2015-07-29 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment Nuclear Experiment Nuclear Theory Atomic Physics

Abstract

We perform a new analysis of electron-proton scattering data to determine the proton electric and magnetic radii, enforcing model-independent constraints from form factor analyticity. A wide-ranging study of possible systematic effects is performed. An improved analysis is developed that rebins data taken at identical kinematic settings, and avoids a scaling assumption of systematic errors with statistical errors. Employing standard models for radiative corrections, our improved analysis of the 2010 Mainz A1 Collaboration data yields a proton electric radius rE=0.895(20)r_E = 0.895(20) fm and magnetic radius rM=0.776(38)r_M = 0.776(38) fm. A similar analysis applied to world data (excluding Mainz data) implies rE=0.916(24)r_E = 0.916(24) fm and rM=0.914(35)r_M = 0.914(35) fm. The Mainz and world values of the charge radius are consistent, and a simple combination yields a value rE=0.904(15)r_E = 0.904(15) fm that is 4σ4\sigma larger than the CREMA Collaboration muonic hydrogen determination. The Mainz and world values of the magnetic radius differ by 2.7σ2.7\sigma, and a simple average yields rM=0.851(26)r_M= 0.851(26) fm. The circumstances under which published muonic hydrogen and electron scattering data could be reconciled are discussed, including a possible deficiency in the standard radiative correction model which requires further analysis.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1505.01489,
  title  = {Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data},
  author = {Gabriel Lee and John R. Arrington and Richard J. Hill},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01489},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

26 pages, 10 figures, 4 supplementary data files with explanatory text. v2: As published in PRD including supplementary material. Added comparison to alternate model for correlated systematic errors and more references. Updated fit values with minor changes from v1

R2 v1 2026-06-22T09:29:20.193Z