English

Estimating Evaporation Fields and Specific Heats Through Atom Probe Tomography

Materials Science 2020-08-06 v1

Abstract

Estimations of evaporation field values in atom probe tomography (APT) literature are sparse despite their importance in the reconstruction and data analysis process. This work describes a straightforward method for estimating the zero-barrier evaporation field (FEF_E) that uses the measured voltage vs. laser pulse energy for a constant evaporation rate. This estimate depends on the sample radius of curvature and its specific heat (CpC_p). If a similar measurement is made of the measured voltage vs. base temperature for a fixed evaporation rate, direct extraction of the material's CpC_p can be made, leaving only the sample radius of curvature as an input parameter. The method is applied to extract FEF_E from a previously published voltage vs. laser pulse energy dataset for CdTe (18.07±0.87 V nm118.07 \pm 0.87~\mathrm{V~nm^{-1}}); furthermore, using the published voltage vs. base-temperature sweep of CdTe permits extraction of a specific heat (11.27±2.54 J K1mol111.27 \pm 2.54~\mathrm{J~K^{-1}mol^{-1}} at 23.1 K23.1~\mathrm{K}) in good agreement with the literature (11.14 J K1mol111.14~\mathrm{J~K^{-1}mol^{-1}} at 22.17 K22.17~\mathrm{K}). The method is then applied to the previously uncharacterized material tris[2-phenylpyridinato-C2,N]iridium(III) (Ir(ppy)3\mathrm{Ir(ppy)_3}), yielding FE=7.49±0.96 V nm1F_E = 7.49 \pm 0.96~\mathrm{V~nm^{-1}} and Cp=173±27 J K1mol1C_p = 173 \pm 27~\mathrm{J~K^{-1} mol^{-1}}; this FEF_E is much lower than most materials characterized with APT to date.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2008.01838,
  title  = {Estimating Evaporation Fields and Specific Heats Through Atom Probe Tomography},
  author = {Andrew P. Proudian and Jeramy D. Zimmerman},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.01838},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

5 pages, 2 figures, submitted to Applied Physics Letters

R2 v1 2026-06-23T17:38:45.907Z