English

Empirical Chaos Processes and Blind Deconvolution

Information Theory 2016-09-21 v2 math.IT

Abstract

This paper investigates conditions under which certain kinds of systems of bilinear equations have a unique structured solution. In particular, we look at when we can recover vectors w,q\boldsymbol{w},\boldsymbol{q} from observations of the form y=<w,b><c,q>,=1,,L, y_{\ell} = <\boldsymbol{w},\boldsymbol{b}_{\ell}><\boldsymbol{c}_{\ell},\boldsymbol{q}>, \quad \ell = 1,\ldots,L, where b,c\boldsymbol{b}_\ell,\boldsymbol{c}_\ell are known. We show that if wCM1\boldsymbol{w}\in\mathbb{C}^{M_1} and qCM2\boldsymbol{q}\in\mathbb{C}^{M_2} are sparse, with no more than KK and NN nonzero entries, respectively, and the b,c\boldsymbol{b}_\ell,\boldsymbol{c}_\ell are generic, selected as independent Gaussian random vectors, then w,q\boldsymbol{w},\boldsymbol{q} are uniquely determined from LConst(K+N)log5(M1M2) L \geq \mathrm{Const}\cdot (K+N)\log^5(M_1M_2) such equations with high probability. The key ingredient in our analysis is a uniform probabilistic bound on how far a random process of the form Z(X)==1LbXc2Z(\boldsymbol{X}) = \sum_{\ell=1}^L|\boldsymbol{b}_\ell^*\boldsymbol{X}\boldsymbol{c}_\ell|^2 deviates from its mean over a set of structured matrices XX\boldsymbol{X}\in\mathcal{X}. As both b\boldsymbol{b}_\ell and c\boldsymbol{c}_\ell are random, this is a specialized type of 44th order chaos; we refer to Z(X)Z(\boldsymbol{X}) as an {\em empirical chaos process}. Bounding this process yields a set of general conditions for when the map X{bXc}=1L\boldsymbol{X}\rightarrow \{\boldsymbol{b}_\ell^*\boldsymbol{X}\boldsymbol{c}_\ell\}_{\ell=1}^L is a restricted isometry over the set of matrices X\mathcal{X}. The conditions are stated in terms of general geometric properties of the set X\mathcal{X}, and are explicitly computed for the case where X\mathcal{X} is the set of matrices that are simultaneously sparse and low rank.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1608.08370,
  title  = {Empirical Chaos Processes and Blind Deconvolution},
  author = {Ali Ahmed and Felix Krahmer and Justin Romberg},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.08370},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

A counter example suggests that the result in Theorem 2 may not be completely true. This requires a re-evaluation of the entire manuscript and the underlying analytical proofs. The authors have therefore decided to withdraw the paper at this point

R2 v1 2026-06-22T15:34:44.351Z