Purpose: Computational head models are essential tools for studying the risk of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) under different activities and across populations. However, different computational models incorporate varied levels of anatomical details, such as cortical folds. In this study, we aim to determine the effect of modeling cortical folds on mTBI risk assessment. Methods: We compared the gyrencephalic (with cortical folds) and lissencephalic (without cortical folds) FE models of 18 subjects aged 9 - 18 years, under a rotational head acceleration event. A rotational acceleration of 10 krad/s2 and 10 ms duration was simulated about each principal head axis. We analyzed different mTBI injury metrics, including maximum principal strain (MPS95), maximum principal strain rate (MPSR95), and cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM15), for the whole brain as well as for specific regions of interest (ROIs). Results: Modeling cortical folds consistently predicted higher injury metrics across all individuals and rotational direction, with the bias (mean ± std. dev.) of −21.17±9.1% in MPS95, −17.1±7.6% in MPSR95, and −14.4±11.3% in CSDM15. Modeling cortical folds significantly affected the spatial strain distributions, with the DICE similarity coefficient on peak MPS ranging between 0.07−0.43 and DICE on CSDM15 ranging between 0.42−0.70; and increasing the peak injury metrics even in the geometrically unaltered regions of interest, such as the corpus callosum, cerebellum, and brain stem, by up to 50%. Conclusions: The study finds that the inclusion of cortical folds significantly alters the pattern of deformation in the brain, thereby affecting the mTBI risk predictions head rotations.
@article{arxiv.2510.08379,
title = {Effect of modeling subject-specific cortical folds on brain injury risk prediction under blunt impact loading},
author = {Anu Tripathi and Alison Brooks and Traci Snedden and Peter Ferrazzano and Christian Franck and Rika Wright Carlsen},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08379},
year = {2025}
}