English

Dynamics on abelian varieties in positive characteristic

Number Theory 2019-01-02 v2 Algebraic Geometry Dynamical Systems

Abstract

We study periodic points for endomorphisms σ\sigma of abelian varieties AA over algebraically closed fields of positive characteristic pp. We show that the dynamical zeta function ζσ\zeta_\sigma of σ\sigma is either rational or transcendental, the first case happening precisely when σn1\sigma^n-1 is a separable isogeny for all nn. We call this condition very inseparability and show it is equivalent to the action of σ\sigma on the local pp-torsion group scheme being nilpotent. The "false" zeta function DσD_\sigma, in which the number of fixed points of σn\sigma^n is replaced by the degree of σn1\sigma^n-1, is always a rational function. Let 1/Λ1/\Lambda denote its largest real pole and assume no other pole or zero has the same absolute value. Then, using a general dichotomy result for power series proven by Royals and Ward in the appendix, we find that ζσ(z)\zeta_\sigma(z) has a natural boundary at z=1/Λ|z|=1/\Lambda when σ\sigma is not very inseparable. We introduce and study tame dynamics, ignoring orbits whose order is divisible by pp. We construct a tame zeta function ζσ\zeta^*_{\sigma} that is always algebraic, and such that ζσ\zeta_\sigma factors into an infinite product of tame zeta functions. We briefly discuss functional equations. Finally, we study the length distribution of orbits and tame orbits. Orbits of very inseparable endomorphisms distribute like those of Axiom A systems with entropy logΛ\log \Lambda, but the orbit length distribution of not very inseparable endomorphisms is more erratic and similar to SS-integer dynamical systems. We provide an expression for the prime orbit counting function in which the error term displays a power saving depending on the largest real part of a zero of Dσ(Λs)D_\sigma(\Lambda^{-s}).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1802.07662,
  title  = {Dynamics on abelian varieties in positive characteristic},
  author = {Jakub Byszewski and Gunther Cornelissen and Robert Royals and Thomas Ward},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07662},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

Appendix by Robert Royals and Thomas Ward. Expanded introduction including a worked example; added argument (Prop. 5.4) to only have to consider zeros instead of zeros and poles; further minor changes; 47 pp

R2 v1 2026-06-23T00:29:03.173Z