Distributed Random Walks
Abstract
Performing random walks in networks is a fundamental primitive that has found applications in many areas of computer science, including distributed computing. In this paper, we focus on the problem of sampling random walks efficiently in a distributed network and its applications. Given bandwidth constraints, the goal is to minimize the number of rounds required to obtain random walk samples. All previous algorithms that compute a random walk sample of length as a subroutine always do so naively, i.e., in rounds. The main contribution of this paper is a fast distributed algorithm for performing random walks. We present a sublinear time distributed algorithm for performing random walks whose time complexity is sublinear in the length of the walk. Our algorithm performs a random walk of length in rounds ( hides factors where is the number of nodes in the network) with high probability on an undirected network, where is the diameter of the network. For small diameter graphs, this is a significant improvement over the naive bound. Furthermore, our algorithm is optimal within a poly-logarithmic factor as there exists a matching lower bound [Nanongkai et al. PODC 2011]. We further extend our algorithms to efficiently perform independent random walks in rounds. We also show that our algorithm can be applied to speedup the more general Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Our random walk algorithms can be used to speed up distributed algorithms in applications that use random walks as a subroutine, such as computing a random spanning tree and estimating mixing time and related parameters. Our algorithm is fully decentralized and can serve as a building block in the design of topologically-aware networks.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1302.4544,
title = {Distributed Random Walks},
author = {Atish Das Sarma and Danupon Nanongkai and Gopal Pandurangan and Prasad Tetali},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.4544},
year = {2013}
}
Comments
Preprint of an article to appear in Journal of the ACM in February 2013. The official journal version has several gramatical corrections. Preliminary versions of this paper appeared in PODC 2009 and PODC 2010. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:0911.3195, arXiv:1205.5525