English

Diophantine properties of IETs and general systems: Quantitative proximality and connectivity

Dynamical Systems 2012-09-28 v2 Number Theory

Abstract

We present shrinking targets results for general systems with the emphasis on applications for IETs (interval exchange transformations) (J,T)(J,T), J=[0,1)J=[0,1). In particular, we prove that if an IET (J,T)(J,T) is ergodic (relative to the Lebesgue measure \lam\lam), then the equality lim infnnTn(x)y=0(A1) \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits n |T^n(x)-y|=0 \tag{A1} holds for \lam\ttimes\lam\lam\ttimes\lam-a. a. (x,y)J2(x,y)\in J^2. The ergodicity assumption is essential: the result does not extend to all minimal IETs. The factor nn in (A1) is optimal (e. g., it cannot be replaced by nln(ln(lnn))n \ln(\ln(\ln n)). On the other hand, for Lebesgue almost all 3-IETs (J,T)(J,T) we prove that for all \eps>0\eps>0 lim infnn\epsTn(x)Tn(y)=,for Lebesgue a. a.(x,y)J2.(A2) \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits n^\eps |T^n(x)-T^n(y)|= \infty,\quad \text{for Lebesgue a. a.} (x,y)\in J^2. \tag{A2} This should be contrasted with the equality lim infnTn(x)Tn(y)=0, \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits |T^n(x)-T^n(y)|=0, for a. a. (x,y)J2(x,y)\in J^2, which holds since (J2,T×T)(J^2, T\times T) is ergodic (because generic 3-IETs (J,T)(J,T) are weakly mixing). We also prove that no 3-IET is strongly topologically mixing.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0910.5422,
  title  = {Diophantine properties of IETs and general systems: Quantitative proximality and connectivity},
  author = {Michael Boshernitzan and Jon Chaika},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.5422},
  year   = {2012}
}

Comments

24 pages. Revised version