Finding attackable sentences in an argument is the first step toward successful refutation in argumentation. We present a first large-scale analysis of sentence attackability in online arguments. We analyze driving reasons for attacks in argumentation and identify relevant characteristics of sentences. We demonstrate that a sentence's attackability is associated with many of these characteristics regarding the sentence's content, proposition types, and tone, and that an external knowledge source can provide useful information about attackability. Building on these findings, we demonstrate that machine learning models can automatically detect attackable sentences in arguments, significantly better than several baselines and comparably well to laypeople.
@article{arxiv.2010.02660,
title = {Detecting Attackable Sentences in Arguments},
author = {Yohan Jo and Seojin Bang and Emaad Manzoor and Eduard Hovy and Chris Reed},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02660},
year = {2020}
}