AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions
Abstract
Argumentation is a type of discourse where speakers try to persuade their audience about the reasonableness of a claim by presenting supportive arguments. Most work in argument mining has focused on modeling arguments in monologues. We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level (argument as process) models of argumentation. Fundamentally, this approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our approach for relation prediction uses contextual information in terms of fine-tuning a pre-trained language model and leveraging discourse relations based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. We additionally propose a candidate selection method to automatically predict what parts of one's argument will be targeted by other participants in the discussion. Our models obtain significant improvements compared to recent state-of-the-art approaches using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2004.14677,
title = {AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions},
author = {Tuhin Chakrabarty and Christopher Hidey and Smaranda Muresan and Kathy Mckeown and Alyssa Hwang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.14677},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
EMNLP 2019