English

AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions

Computation and Language 2020-05-01 v1 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Argumentation is a type of discourse where speakers try to persuade their audience about the reasonableness of a claim by presenting supportive arguments. Most work in argument mining has focused on modeling arguments in monologues. We propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level (argument as process) models of argumentation. Fundamentally, this approach relies on identifying relations between components of arguments in a discussion thread. Our approach for relation prediction uses contextual information in terms of fine-tuning a pre-trained language model and leveraging discourse relations based on Rhetorical Structure Theory. We additionally propose a candidate selection method to automatically predict what parts of one's argument will be targeted by other participants in the discussion. Our models obtain significant improvements compared to recent state-of-the-art approaches using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2004.14677,
  title  = {AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions},
  author = {Tuhin Chakrabarty and Christopher Hidey and Smaranda Muresan and Kathy Mckeown and Alyssa Hwang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.14677},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

EMNLP 2019

R2 v1 2026-06-23T15:12:28.171Z