English

Decoupling for Markov Chains

Probability 2025-12-23 v1

Abstract

Consider a Markov chain (Xi)i0(X_i)_{i\ge0} with invariant measure μ\mu that admits the representation Xi+1=Φ(Xi,Ui)X_{i+1}=\Phi(X_i,U_i), where (Ui)i0(U_i)_{i\ge0} are i.i.d. random variables and Φ\Phi is a measurable map. We introduce a tangent-decoupled process (X~i)i0(\widetilde X_i)_{i\ge0} obtained by replacing (Ui)(U_i) with an independent copy. Conditional on the realized backbone (Xi)(X_i), the sequence (f(X~i))(f(\widetilde X_i)) is independent. Although (X~i)(\widetilde X_i) is not Markovian, under the same ergodicity assumptions that ensure a law of large numbers for (Xi)(X_i), the empirical averages n1i=1nf(X~i)n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^n f(\widetilde X_i) converge almost surely to μ(f)\mu(f). In addition, for every fL2(μ)f\in L^2(\mu) and every N1N\ge1, Var ⁣(i=1Nf(Xi))    2Var ⁣(i=1Nf(X~i)), \operatorname{Var}\!\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^N f(X_i)\Bigr) \;\le\; 2\,\operatorname{Var}\!\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^N f(\widetilde X_i)\Bigr), and therefore σf22σ~f2\sigma_f^2 \le 2\,\widetilde\sigma_f^{\,2} for the corresponding time-average variance constants. The inequality requires neither reversibility nor mixing assumptions. Its proof identifies the two sequences as tangent in the sense of decoupling theory and applies the sharp L2L^2 tangent decoupling inequality of de la Pe\~na, Yao, and Alemayehu (2025).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2512.19351,
  title  = {Decoupling for Markov Chains},
  author = {Nawaf Bou-Rabee and Victor H. de la Peña},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19351},
  year   = {2025}
}