English

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2021-04-27 v2

Abstract

Measurements of large-scale structure are interpreted using theoretical predictions for the matter distribution, including potential impacts of baryonic physics. We constrain the feedback strength of baryons jointly with cosmology using weak lensing and galaxy clustering observables (3×\times2pt) of Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 data in combination with external information from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization. Our baryon modeling is informed by a set of hydrodynamical simulations that span a variety of baryon scenarios; we span this space via a Principal Component (PC) analysis of the summary statistics extracted from these simulations. We show that at the level of DES Y1 constraining power, one PC is sufficient to describe the variation of baryonic effects in the observables, and the first PC amplitude (Q1Q_1) generally reflects the strength of baryon feedback. With the upper limit of Q1Q_1 prior being bound by the Illustris feedback scenarios, we reach 20%\sim 20\% improvement in the constraint of S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.7880.021+0.018S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}=0.788^{+0.018}_{-0.021} compared to the original DES 3×\times2pt analysis. This gain is driven by the inclusion of small-scale cosmic shear information down to 2.5 arcmin, which was excluded in previous DES analyses that did not model baryonic physics. We obtain S8=0.7810.015+0.014S_8=0.781^{+0.014}_{-0.015} for the combined DES Y1+Planck EE+BAO analysis with a non-informative Q1Q_1 prior. In terms of the baryon constraints, we measure Q1=1.142.80+2.20Q_1=1.14^{+2.20}_{-2.80} for DES Y1 only and Q1=1.421.48+1.63Q_1=1.42^{+1.63}_{-1.48} for DESY1+Planck EE+BAO, allowing us to exclude one of the most extreme AGN feedback hydrodynamical scenario at more than 2σ2 \sigma.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2007.15026,
  title  = {Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe},
  author = {Hung-Jin Huang and Tim Eifler and Rachel Mandelbaum and Gary M. Bernstein and Anqi Chen and Ami Choi and Juan García-Bellido and Dragan Huterer and Elisabeth Krause and Eduardo Rozo and Sukhdeep Singh and Sarah Bridle and Joseph DeRose and Jack Elvin-Pole and Xiao Fang and Oliver Friedrich and Marco Gatti and Enrique Gaztanaga and Daniel Gruen and Will Hartley and Ben Hoyle and Mike Jarvis and Niall MacCrann and Markus Rau and Vivian Miranda and Judit Prat and Carles Sánchez and Simon Samuroff and Michael Troxel and Joe Zuntz and Tim Abbott and Michel Aguena and James Annis and Santiago Avila and Matthew Becker and Emmanuel Bertin and David Brooks and David Burke and Aurelio Carnero Rosell and Matias Carrasco Kind and Jorge Carretero and Francisco Javier Castander and Luiz da Costa and Juan De Vicente and Jörg Dietrich and Peter Doel and Spencer Everett and Brenna Flaugher and Pablo Fosalba and Josh Frieman and Robert Gruendl and Gaston Gutierrez and Samuel Hinton and Klaus Honscheid and David James and Kyler Kuehn and Ofer Lahav and Marcos Lima and Marcio Maia and Jennifer Marshall and Felipe Menanteau and Ramon Miquel and Francisco Paz-Chinchón and Andrés Plazas Malagón and Kathy Romer and Aaron Roodman and Eusebio Sanchez and Vic Scarpine and Santiago Serrano and Ignacio Sevilla and Mathew Smith and Marcelle Soares-Santos and Eric Suchyta and Molly Swanson and Gregory Tarle and Diehl H. Thomas and Jochen Weller},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.15026},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

22 pages, 18 figures, 2 tables. accepted to MNRAS. A brief video summary of this paper is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbeNwk5papU