English

Counting subgraphs in bounded-size Achlioptas processes

Probability 2026-05-12 v1 Combinatorics

Abstract

Achlioptas processes such as the Bohman--Frieze process are much harder to analyse than the classical Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi process, due to the dependence between edges added at different stages. This dependence means that most analysis so far is dynamic, often based on the differential equation method. In the Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi case there is an alternative static approach, pioneered by Erd\H{o}s, R\'enyi and Bollob\'as, based on evaluating the expectation (and higher moments) of various subgraph counts, and using this to study the component structure. Here we show that this latter approach can be applied (with some complications) to the Bohman--Frieze process. For example, we are able to show that the expected number μk,t,n\mu_{k,t,n} of kk-vertex tree components after tntn steps satisfies (essentially) μk,t,n=ck,tn(1+O(k/n))\mu_{k,t,n}=c_{k,t}n(1+O(k/\sqrt{n})). Our method gives a very complicated formula for ck,tc_{k,t}, which seems to be unusable. However, since ck,tc_{k,t} does not depend on nn, we may use recent results obtained by the differential equation method and branching process analysis to find the asymptotics of ck,tc_{k,t} as kk\to\infty. The latter results also give a formula for μk,t,n\mu_{k,t,n} of the form ck,tnc_{k,t}n plus an error term, with a much more usable description of ck,tc_{k,t} but a much worse error term. We combine the best of both worlds to prove a number of new results about the process near criticality. In particular, we obtain extremely sharp bounds on the size of the largest non-giant component near criticality, including the limiting distribution of its fluctuations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2605.09466,
  title  = {Counting subgraphs in bounded-size Achlioptas processes},
  author = {Mihyun Kang and Oliver Riordan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.09466},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

31 pages