English

Counterexamples for lacunary dilates via dyadic spike blocks

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2026-04-22 v2 Probability

Abstract

We construct dyadic lacunary counterexamples for two problems of Erd\H{o}s on pointwise behavior of dilates on the circle. The main device is a dyadic spike block: rare positive spikes create long positive runs in the lacunary averages, while a deterministic lower floor prevents cancellation from the remaining stages. The endpoint construction gives a mean-zero f1q<Lq(T)f\in\bigcap_{1\le q<\infty}L^q(\mathbb T) and a sequence nj=2mjn_j=2^{m_j}, nj+1/nj2n_{j+1}/n_j\ge2, such that fSNf2(loglogN)1/2,lim supN1NjNf(njx)=+ \|f-S_Nf\|_2\ll (\log\log N)^{-1/2}, \qquad \limsup_{N\to\infty} \frac1N\sum_{j\le N}f(n_jx)=+\infty for almost every xx. Thus Matsuyama's positive theorem at exponent c>1/2c>1/2 cannot be extended to the endpoint c=1/2c=1/2, and Erd\H{o}s Problem #996 has a negative answer. A second choice of parameters gives, for every 2p<2\le p<\infty, functions fLp(T)f\in L^p(\mathbb T) with lim supNjNf(njx)N(logN)1/pε=+(ε>0) \limsup_{N\to\infty} \frac{\sum_{j\le N}f(n_jx)} {N(\log N)^{1/p-\varepsilon}} =+\infty \qquad(\varepsilon>0) almost everywhere; the case p=2p=2 answers Erd\H{o}s Problem #995. We also include a bounded small-set companion construction.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.18535,
  title  = {Counterexamples for lacunary dilates via dyadic spike blocks},
  author = {Boon Suan Ho},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.18535},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

v2: 27 pages, simplified proofs and strengthened main result

R2 v1 2026-07-01T12:18:48.219Z