English

Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2026-04-07 v2

Abstract

The big bang quantum cosmology model introduces the trace JJ of the Schouten tensor as a form of dynamic dark energy. Together with cold dark matter, these components form the so-called JJCDM cosmology model, proposed by M.H.P.M. van Putten (J. High Energy Astrophys., 45, 2025, 194), which offers a potential resolution to the Hubble tension. We derive the constraints on the JJCDM cosmology model, utilizing early- and late-time cosmological data including cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) released by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), cosmic chronometers (CC), and type Ia supernovae (SNIa). For a flat universe, the JJCDM model yields H0=66.95±0.51km s1 Mpc1 H_0 = 66.95 \pm 0.51 \, \rm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}} and Ωm=0.3419±0.0065 \Omega_m = 0.3419 \pm 0.0065 , results that are consistent with early-universe observations but exhibit a higher Ωm \Omega_m compared to the Λ\LambdaCDM model. In the case of a non-flat universe, JJCDM favors a slightly curved geometry with Ωk=0.0154±0.0027 \Omega_k = 0.0154 \pm 0.0027 , leading to H0=69.13±0.56km s1 Mpc1 H_0 = 69.13 \pm 0.56 \, \rm {km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}} and Ωm=0.3477±0.0074 \Omega_m = 0.3477 \pm 0.0074 . The increase in H0 H_0 in the non-flat scenario suggests a geometric degeneracy between spatial curvature and H0 H_0 . We also investigate the internal inconsistencies present in DESI data and evaluate their impacts on cosmological parameter constraints. Our analysis shows that while the JJCDM model, which is constructed from first principles without free parameters beyond those of Λ\LambdaCDM, agrees excellently with late-time cosmology, it struggles to simultaneously match early-universe observations in a fully self-consistent manner.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.25999,
  title  = {Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model},
  author = {Yicheng Wang and Yupeng Yang and Xinyi Dai and Shuangxi Yi and Yankun Qu and Fayin Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25999},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

13 pages, 4 figures. Comments are welcome