English

Conch Maximal Subrings

Commutative Algebra 2020-09-15 v1

Abstract

It is shown that if RR is a ring, pp a prime element of an integral domain DRD\leq R with n=1pnD=0\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty p^nD=0 and pU(R)p\in U(R), then RR has a conch maximal subring (see \cite{faith}). We prove that either a ring RR has a conch maximal subring or U(S)=SU(R)U(S)=S\cap U(R) for each subring SS of RR (i.e., each subring of RR is closed with respect to taking inverse, see \cite{invsub}). In particular, either RR has a conch maximal subring or U(R)U(R) is integral over the prime subring of RR. We observe that if RR is an integral domain with R=220|R|=2^{2^{\aleph_0}}, then either RR has a maximal subring or Max(R)=20|Max(R)|=2^{\aleph_0}, and in particular if in addition dim(R)=1dim(R)=1, then RR has a maximal subring. If RTR\subseteq T be an integral ring extension, QSpec(T)Q\in Spec(T), P:=QRP:=Q\cap R, then we prove that whenever RR has a conch maximal subring SS with (S:R)=P(S:R)=P, then TT has a conch maximal subring VV such that (V:T)=Q(V:T)=Q and VR=SV\cap R=S. It is shown that if KK is an algebraically closed field which is not algebraic over its prime subring and RR is affine ring over KK, then for each prime ideal PP of RR with ht(P)dim(R)1ht(P)\geq dim(R)-1, there exists a maximal subring SS of RR with (S:R)=P(S:R)=P. If RR is a normal affine integral domain over a field KK, then we prove that RR is an integrally closed maximal subring of a ring TT if and only if dim(R)=1dim(R)=1 and in particular in this case (R:T)=0(R:T)=0.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2009.05995,
  title  = {Conch Maximal Subrings},
  author = {Alborz Azarang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.05995},
  year   = {2020}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-23T18:30:03.875Z