English

Comparison of Pulsar Positions from Timing and Very Long Baseline Astrometry

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2017-05-31 v1 Earth and Planetary Astrophysics Astrophysics of Galaxies Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

Abstract

Pulsar positions can be measured with high precision using both pulsar timing methods and very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI). Pulsar timing positions are referenced to a solar-system ephemeris, whereas VLBI positions are referenced to distant quasars. Here we compare pulsar positions from published VLBI measurements with those obtained from pulsar timing data from the Nanshan and Parkes radio telescopes in order to relate the two reference frames. We find that the timing positions differ significantly from the VLBI positions (and also differ between different ephemerides). A statistically significant change in the obliquity of the ecliptic of 2.16±0.332.16\pm0.33\,mas is found for the JPL ephemeris DE405, but no significant rotation is found in subsequent JPL ephemerides. The accuracy with which we can relate the two frames is limited by the current uncertainties in the VLBI reference source positions and in matching the pulsars to their reference source. Not only do the timing positions depend on the ephemeris used in computing them, but also different segments of the timing data lead to varying position estimates. These variations are mostly common to all ephemerides, but slight changes are seen at the 10μ\muas level between ephemerides.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1704.01011,
  title  = {Comparison of Pulsar Positions from Timing and Very Long Baseline Astrometry},
  author = {J. B. Wang and W. A. Coles and G. Hobbs and R. M. Shannon and R. N. Manchester and M. Kerr and J. P. Yuan and N. Wang and M. Bailes and N. D. R. Bhat and S. Dai J. Dempsey and M. J. Keith and P. D. Lasky and Y. Levin and S. Os lowski and V. Ravi and D. J. Reardon and P A. Rosado and C. J. Russell and R. Spiewak and W. van Straten and L. Toomey and L. Wen and X. -P. You and X. -J. Zhu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01011},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

accepted by MNRAS,22 pages, 5 figures