Checking election outcome accuracy Post-election audit sampling
Abstract
This article * provides an overview of post-election audit sampling research and compares various approaches to calculating post-election audit sample sizes, focusing on risklimiting audits, * discusses fundamental concepts common to all risk-limiting post-election audits, presenting new margin error bounds, sampling weights and sampling probabilities that improve upon existing approaches and work for any size audit unit and for single or multi-winner election contests, * provides two new simple formulas for estimating post-election audit sample sizes in cases when detailed data, expertise, or tools are not available, * summarizes four improved methods for calculating risk-limiting election audit sample sizes, showing how to apply precise margin error bounds to improve the accuracy and efficacy of existing methods, and * discusses sampling mistakes that reduce post-election audit effectiveness.
Cite
@article{arxiv.0907.3166,
title = {Checking election outcome accuracy Post-election audit sampling},
author = {Kathy Dopp},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.3166},
year = {2009}
}
Comments
37 pages + 19 pages of appendices & references, 3 figures, 10 tables