English

Bi-initial objects and bi-representations are not so different

Category Theory 2022-04-15 v3

Abstract

We introduce a functor V ⁣:DblCath,nps2Cath,nps\mathcal V\colon \mathrm{DblCat}_{h,nps}\to \mathrm{2Cat}_{h,nps} extracting from a double category a 22-category whose objects and morphisms are the vertical morphisms and squares. We give a characterisation of bi-representations of a normal pseudo-functor F ⁣:CopCatF\colon \mathbf C^{\operatorname{op}}\to \mathrm{Cat} in terms of double bi-initial objects in the double category El(F)\mathbb{E}l(F) of elements of FF, or equivalently as bi-initial objects of a special form in the 22-category VEl(F)\mathcal V\mathbb{E}l(F) of morphisms of FF. Although not true in general, in the special case where the 22-category C\mathbf C has tensors by the category 2={01}\mathbf{2}=\{0\to 1\} and FF preserves those tensors, we show that a bi-representation of FF is then precisely a bi-initial object in the 22-category El(F)\mathbf{E}l(F) of elements of FF. We give applications of this theory to bi-adjunctions and weighted bi-limits.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2009.05545,
  title  = {Bi-initial objects and bi-representations are not so different},
  author = {Tslil Clingman and Lyne Moser},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.05545},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

52 pages; we fixed issues pointed out by an anonymous referee

R2 v1 2026-06-23T18:28:47.348Z