English

Automata and tame expansions of $(\mathbb{Z},+)$

Logic 2020-10-09 v2

Abstract

The problem of characterizing which automatic sets of integers are stable is here solved. Given a positive integer dd and a subset AZA\subseteq \mathbb{Z} whose set of representations base dd is recognized by a finite automaton, a necessary condition is found for x+yAx+y\in A to be a stable formula in Th(Z,+,A)\operatorname{Th}(\mathbb{Z},+,A). Combined with a theorem of Moosa and Scanlon this gives a combinatorial characterization of the dd-automatic AZA\subseteq \mathbb{Z} such that (Z,+,A)(\mathbb{Z},+,A) is stable. This characterization is in terms of what were called "FF-sets" by Moosa and Scanlon and "elementary pp-nested sets" by Derksen. Automata-theoretic methods are also used to produce some NIP expansions of (Z,+)(\mathbb{Z},+), in particular the expansion by the monoid (dN,×)(d^\mathbb{N},\times ).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2007.00070,
  title  = {Automata and tame expansions of $(\mathbb{Z},+)$},
  author = {Christopher D. C. Hawthorne},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00070},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

21 pages. Main result improved; thanks to Gabriel Conant