Game-based assessments (GBAs) are increasingly adopted in recruitment contexts as tools to assess transversal skills through observable behavior. However, empirical evidence directly comparing game-based behavioral indicators with traditional self-report measures remains limited. This study adopts a method-comparison approach to explore the convergence between self-perceived and behaviorally enacted problem-solving competence, comparing a game-based assessment with the Problem Solving Inventory (PSI-B). Seventy-two participants completed both the PSI-B and a five-minute game-based problem-solving task, which classified performance into four behavioral proficiency levels. Results revealed no significant convergence between self-reported and behavior-based problem-solving scores, indicating a lack of convergence between the two measurement modalities. Rather than indicating a lack of validity of the game-based assessment, these findings support the view that self-report and behavioral measures provide complementary information about problem-solving competence. The study highlights the risks of relying on a single assessment modality in personnel selection and underscores the value of integrating game-based tools within multi-method assessment frameworks.
@article{arxiv.2602.05525,
title = {Assessing Problem-Solving in HR Contexts: A Comparison Between Game-Based and Self-Report Measures},
author = {Fabrizio Fornari and Eleonora Cova and Niccolò Vito Vacca and Francesco Bocci and Marcello Sarini and Luigi Caputo},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05525},
year = {2026}
}