English

Architecting Safer Autonomous Aviation Systems

Software Engineering 2023-01-20 v1 Artificial Intelligence Systems and Control Systems and Control

Abstract

The aviation literature gives relatively little guidance to practitioners about the specifics of architecting systems for safety, particularly the impact of architecture on allocating safety requirements, or the relative ease of system assurance resulting from system or subsystem level architectural choices. As an exemplar, this paper considers common architectural patterns used within traditional aviation systems and explores their safety and safety assurance implications when applied in the context of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based functionality. Considering safety as an architectural property, we discuss both the allocation of safety requirements and the architectural trade-offs involved early in the design lifecycle. This approach could be extended to other assured properties, similar to safety, such as security. We conclude with a discussion of the safety considerations that emerge in the context of candidate architectural patterns that have been proposed in the recent literature for enabling autonomy capabilities by integrating AI and ML. A recommendation is made for the generation of a property-driven architectural pattern catalogue.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2301.08138,
  title  = {Architecting Safer Autonomous Aviation Systems},
  author = {Jane Fenn and Mark Nicholson and Ganesh Pai and Michael Wilkinson},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08138},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

18 pages, 12 figures, to appear in the proceedings of the 2023 Safety-critical Systems Symposium (SSS '23), York, UK

R2 v1 2026-06-28T08:15:29.150Z