English

An unexpected encounter with Cauchy and L\'evy

Statistics Theory 2015-10-20 v2 Probability Statistics Theory

Abstract

The Cauchy distribution is usually presented as a mathematical curiosity, an exception to the Law of Large Numbers, or even as an "Evil" distribution in some introductory courses. It therefore surprised us when Drton and Xiao (2016) proved the following result for m=2m=2 and conjectured it for m3m\ge 3. Let X=(X1,...,Xm)X= (X_1,..., X_m) and Y=(Y1,...,Ym)Y = (Y_1, ...,Y_m) be i.i.d N(0,Σ)N(0,\Sigma), where Σ={σij}0\Sigma=\{\sigma_{ij}\}\ge 0 is an m×mm\times m and \textit{arbitrary} covariance matrix with σjj>0\sigma_{jj}>0 for all 1jm1\leq j\leq m. Then Z=j=1mwjXjYj Cauchy(0,1),Z = \sum_{j=1}^m w_j \frac{X_j}{Y_j} \ \sim \mathrm{Cauchy}(0,1), as long as w=(w1,...,wm)w=(w_1,..., w_m) is independent of (X,Y)(X, Y), wj0,j=1,...,mw_j\ge 0, j=1,..., m, and j=1mwj=1\sum_{j=1}^m w_j=1. In this note, we present an elementary proof of this conjecture for any m2m \geq 2 by linking ZZ to a geometric characterization of Cauchy(0,1) given in Willams (1969). This general result is essential to the large sample behavior of Wald tests in many applications such as factor models and contingency tables. It also leads to other unexpected results such as i=1mj=1mwiwjσijXiXjLeˊvy(0,1). \sum_{i=1}^m\sum_{j=1}^m \frac{w_iw_j\sigma_{ij}}{X_iX_j} \sim {\text{L\'{e}vy}}(0, 1). This generalizes the "super Cauchy phenomenon" that the average of mm i.i.d. standard L\'evy variables (i.e., inverse chi-squared variables with one degree of freedom) has the same distribution as that of a single standard L\'evy variable multiplied by mm (which is obtained by taking wj=1/mw_j=1/m and Σ\Sigma to be the identity matrix).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1505.01957,
  title  = {An unexpected encounter with Cauchy and L\'evy},
  author = {Natesh S. Pillai and Xiao-Li Meng},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01957},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

We present an elementary proof of a recent conjecture about a Cauchy random variable obtained as the ratio of dependent Gaussians; A minor correction from the previous version; a figure added. This is the final version

R2 v1 2026-06-22T09:30:15.987Z