We present ZhoBLiMP, the largest linguistic minimal pair benchmark for Chinese, with over 100 paradigms, ranging from topicalization to the \textit{Ba} construction. We then train from scratch a suite of Chinese language models (LMs) with different tokenizers, parameter sizes, and token volumes, to study the learning curves of LMs on Chinese. To mitigate the biases introduced by unequal lengths of the sentences in a minimal pair, we propose a new metric named sub-linear length normalized log-probabilities (SLLN-LP). Using SLLN-LP as the metric, our results show that \textsc{Anaphor}, \textsc{Quantifiers}, and \textsc{Ellipsis} in Chinese are difficult for LMs even up to 32B parameters, and that SLLN-LP successfully mitigates biases in ZhoBLiMP, JBLiMP and BLiMP. We conclude that future evaluations should be more carefully designed to consider the intricate relations between linking functions, LMs, and targeted minimal pairs.
@article{arxiv.2411.06096,
title = {A Systematic Assessment of Language Models with Linguistic Minimal Pairs in Chinese},
author = {Yikang Liu and Yeting Shen and Hongao Zhu and Lilong Xu and Zhiheng Qian and Siyuan Song and Kejia Zhang and Jialong Tang and Pei Zhang and Baosong Yang and Rui Wang and Hai Hu},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06096},
year = {2025}
}