English

A Note on the Degree of Field Extensions Involving Classical and Nonholomorphic Singular Moduli

Number Theory 2017-10-25 v3 Logic

Abstract

In their 2015 paper, Mertens and Rolen prove that for a certain level 6 "almost holomorphic" modular function PP, the degree of P(τ)P(\tau) over Q\mathbb{Q} for quadratic τ\tau is as large as expected, settling a conjecture of Bruinier and Ono. Analogously for level 1 modular functions ff, we expect Q(f(τ))\mathbb{Q}(f(\tau)) to have similar degree to Q(j(τ))\mathbb{Q}(j(\tau)). In this paper, I show for a wide class of level 1 almost holomorphic modular functions that 1M[Q(j(τ)):Q][Q(f(τ)):Q][Q(j(τ)):Q]\dfrac{1}{M}[\mathbb{Q}(j(\tau)):\mathbb{Q}]\leq [\mathbb{Q}(f(\tau)):\mathbb{Q}]\leq[\mathbb{Q}(j(\tau)):\mathbb{Q}] for all quadratic τ\tau and some constant MM. This is proven using techniques of o-minimality, and hence can easily be made uniform; the constant MM depends only upon the "degree" of ff (in a certain well-defined sense).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1702.01950,
  title  = {A Note on the Degree of Field Extensions Involving Classical and Nonholomorphic Singular Moduli},
  author = {Haden Spence},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.01950},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

v2: uses a rather different, and arguably more natural, approach to attaining uniformity