English

A Noninequality for the Fractional Gradient

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2019-09-20 v2 Analysis of PDEs Functional Analysis

Abstract

In this paper we give a streamlined proof of an inequality recently obtained by the author: For every α(0,1)\alpha \in (0,1) there exists a constant C=C(α,d)>0C=C(\alpha,d)>0 such that \begin{align*} \|u\|_{L^{d/(d-\alpha),1}(\mathbb{R}^d)} \leq C \| D^\alpha u\|_{L^1(\mathbb{R}^d;\mathbb{R}^d)} \end{align*} for all uLq(Rd)u \in L^q(\mathbb{R}^d) for some 1q<d/(1α)1 \leq q<d/(1-\alpha) such that Dαu:=I1αuL1(Rd;Rd)D^\alpha u:=\nabla I_{1-\alpha} u \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^d;\mathbb{R}^d). We also give a counterexample which shows that in contrast to the case α=1\alpha =1, the fractional gradient does not admit an L1L^1 trace inequality, i.e. DαuL1(Rd;Rd)\| D^\alpha u\|_{L^1(\mathbb{R}^d;\mathbb{R}^d)} cannot control the integral of uu with respect to the Hausdorff content Hdα\mathcal{H}^{d-\alpha}_\infty. The main substance of this counterexample is a result of interest in its own right, that even a weak-type estimate for the Riesz transforms fails on the space L1(Hdβ)L^1(\mathcal{H}^{d-\beta}_\infty), β[1,d)\beta \in [1,d). It is an open question whether this failure of a weak-type estimate for the Riesz transforms extends to β(0,1)\beta \in (0,1).

Cite

@article{arxiv.1906.05541,
  title  = {A Noninequality for the Fractional Gradient},
  author = {Daniel Spector},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05541},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

12 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-23T09:52:26.123Z