English

A forgotten theorem of Pe{\l}czy\'nski: $(\lambda+)$-injective spaces need not be $\lambda$-injective -- the case $\lambda\in (1,2]$

Functional Analysis 2022-05-25 v2

Abstract

Isbell and Semadeni [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 107 (1963)] proved that every infinite-dimensional 11-injective Banach space contains a hyperplane that is (2+ε)(2+\varepsilon)-injective for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, yet is is \emph{not} 22-injective and remarked in a footnote that Pe{\l}czy\'nski had proved for every λ>1\lambda > 1 the existence of a (λ+ε)(\lambda + \varepsilon)-injective space (ε>0\varepsilon > 0) that is not λ\lambda-injective. Unfortunately, no trace of the proof of Pe{\l}czy\'nski's result has been preserved. In the present paper, we establish the said theorem for λ(1,2]\lambda\in (1,2] by constructing an appropriate renorming of \ell_\infty. This contrasts (at least for real scalars) with the case λ=1\lambda = 1 for which Lindenstrauss [Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1964)] proved the contrary statement.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2201.07837,
  title  = {A forgotten theorem of Pe{\l}czy\'nski: $(\lambda+)$-injective spaces need not be $\lambda$-injective -- the case $\lambda\in (1,2]$},
  author = {Tomasz Kania and Grzegorz Lewicki},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07837},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

7 pp; to appear in Studia Mathematica

R2 v1 2026-06-24T08:55:44.859Z