English

A complex analogue of Toda's Theorem

Algebraic Geometry 2011-10-17 v7 Computational Complexity Algebraic Topology Combinatorics

Abstract

Toda \cite{Toda} proved in 1989 that the (discrete) polynomial time hierarchy, PH\mathbf{PH}, is contained in the class \mathbf{P}^{#\mathbf{P}}, namely the class of languages that can be decided by a Turing machine in polynomial time given access to an oracle with the power to compute a function in the counting complexity class #\mathbf{P}. This result, which illustrates the power of counting is considered to be a seminal result in computational complexity theory. An analogous result (with a compactness hypothesis) in the complexity theory over the reals (in the sense of Blum-Shub-Smale real machines \cite{BSS89}) was proved in \cite{BZ09}. Unlike Toda's proof in the discrete case, which relied on sophisticated combinatorial arguments, the proof in \cite{BZ09} is topological in nature in which the properties of the topological join is used in a fundamental way. However, the constructions used in \cite{BZ09} were semi-algebraic -- they used real inequalities in an essential way and as such do not extend to the complex case. In this paper, we extend the techniques developed in \cite{BZ09} to the complex projective case. A key role is played by the complex join of quasi-projective complex varieties. As a consequence we obtain a complex analogue of Toda's theorem. The results contained in this paper, taken together with those contained in \cite{BZ09}, illustrate the central role of the Poincar\'e polynomial in algorithmic algebraic geometry, as well as, in computational complexity theory over the complex and real numbers -- namely, the ability to compute it efficiently enables one to decide in polynomial time all languages in the (compact) polynomial hierarchy over the appropriate field.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0912.2652,
  title  = {A complex analogue of Toda's Theorem},
  author = {Saugata Basu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0912.2652},
  year   = {2011}
}

Comments

31 pages. Final version to appear in Foundations of Computational Mathematics