English

A closer look at the $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2018-06-26 v5 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

The measurement of RDR_D (RDR_{D^*}), the ratio of the branching fraction of BDτνˉτ(BDτνˉτ)\overline{B} \to D \tau \bar{\nu}_\tau (\overline{B} \to D^* \tau \bar{\nu}_\tau) to that of BDlνˉl(BDlνˉl)\overline{B} \to D l \bar{\nu}_l (\overline{B} \to D^* l \bar{\nu}_l), shows 1.9σ1.9 \sigma (3.3σ)(3.3 \sigma) deviation from its Standard Model (SM) prediction. The combined deviation is at the level of 4σ4 \sigma according to the Heavy Flavour Averaging Group (HFAG). In this paper, we perform an effective field theory analysis (at the dimension-6 level) of these potential New Physics (NP) signals assuming SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)Y\rm SU(3)_{C} \times SU(2)_{L} \times U(1)_{Y} gauge invariance. We first show that, in general, RDR_D and RDR_{D^*} are theoretically independent observables and hence, their theoretical predictions are not correlated. We identify the operators that can explain the experimental measurements of RDR_D and RDR_{D^*} individually and also together. Motivated by the recent measurement of the τ\tau polarisation in BDτνˉτ\overline{B} \to D^* \tau \bar{\nu}_\tau decay, Pτ(D)P_\tau (D^*) by the Belle collaboration, we study the impact of a more precise measurement of Pτ(D)P_\tau (D^*) (and a measurement of Pτ(D)P_\tau (D)) on the various possible NP explanations. Furthermore, we show that the measurement of RDR_{D^*} in bins of q2q^2, the square of the invariant mass of the lepton-neutrino system, along with the information on τ\tau polarisation and the forward-backward asymmetry of the τ\tau lepton, can completely distinguish the various operator structures. We also provide the full expressions of the double differential decay widths for the individual τ\tau helicities in the presence of all the 10 dimension-6 operators that can contribute to these decays.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1610.03038,
  title  = {A closer look at the $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies},
  author = {Debjyoti Bardhan and Pritibhajan Byakti and Diptimoy Ghosh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03038},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Mistakes in section 8.1 corrected (not updated in the journal version)