English

What Quantum Measurements Measure

Quantum Physics 2017-09-20 v2

Abstract

A solution to the second measurement problem, determining what prior microscopic properties can be inferred from measurement outcomes ("pointer positions"), is worked out for projective and generalized (POVM) measurements, using consistent histories. The result supports the idea that equipment properly designed and calibrated reveals the properties it was designed to measure. Applications include Einstein's hemisphere and Wheeler's delayed choice paradoxes, and a method for analyzing weak measurements without recourse to weak values. Quantum measurements are noncontextual in the original sense employed by Bell and Mermin: if [A,B]=[A,C]=0,[B,C]0[A,B]=[A,C]=0,\, [B,C]\neq 0, the outcome of an AA measurement does not depend on whether it is measured with BB or with CC. An application to Bohm's model of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen situation suggests that a faulty understanding of quantum measurements is at the root of this paradox.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1704.08725,
  title  = {What Quantum Measurements Measure},
  author = {Robert B. Griffiths},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.08725},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

29 pages, 5 figures. Similar to published version. Only significant change from v1 is the added paragraph at the end of Sec. V E, plus added Refs. [30], [42]

R2 v1 2026-06-22T19:30:15.287Z