English

Visual boundaries of Diestel-Leader graphs

Group Theory 2015-05-29 v2 Geometric Topology

Abstract

Diestel-Leader graphs are neither hyperbolic nor CAT(0), so their visual boundaries may be pathological. Indeed, we show that for d>2d>2, DLd(q)\partial\text{DL}_d(q) carries the indiscrete topology. On the other hand, DL2(q)\partial\text{DL}_2(q), while not Hausdorff, is T1T_1, totally disconnected, and compact. Since DL2(q)\text{DL}_2(q) is a Cayley graph of the lamplighter group LqL_q, we also obtain a nice description of DL2(q)\partial\text{DL}_2(q) in terms of the lamp stand model of LqL_q and discuss the dynamics of the action.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1307.2163,
  title  = {Visual boundaries of Diestel-Leader graphs},
  author = {Keith Jones and Gregory A. Kelsey},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2163},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

19 pages, 5 figures The substantive changes made in this revision are mostly found in Section 5.1, where we prove that geodesics in $\dl_d(q)$ have at most one "turn"

R2 v1 2026-06-22T00:47:37.663Z