English

Time-series Random Process Complexity Ranking Using a Bound on Conditional Differential Entropy

Signal Processing 2025-10-24 v1 Information Theory Audio and Speech Processing math.IT Methodology Machine Learning

Abstract

Conditional differential entropy provides an intuitive measure for relatively ranking time-series complexity by quantifying uncertainty in future observations given past context. However, its direct computation for high-dimensional processes from unknown distributions is often intractable. This paper builds on the information theoretic prediction error bounds established by Fang et al. \cite{fang2019generic}, which demonstrate that the conditional differential entropy \textbf{h(XkXk1,...,Xkm)h(X_k \mid X_{k-1},...,X_{k-m})} is upper bounded by a function of the determinant of the covariance matrix of next-step prediction errors for any next step prediction model. We add to this theoretical framework by further increasing this bound by leveraging Hadamard's inequality and the positive semi-definite property of covariance matrices. To see if these bounds can be used to rank the complexity of time series, we conducted two synthetic experiments: (1) controlled linear autoregressive processes with additive Gaussian noise, where we compare ordinary least squares prediction error entropy proxies to the true entropies of various additive noises, and (2) a complexity ranking task of bio-inspired synthetic audio data with unknown entropy, where neural network prediction errors are used to recover the known complexity ordering. This framework provides a computationally tractable method for time-series complexity ranking using prediction errors from next-step prediction models, that maintains a theoretical foundation in information theory.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2510.20551,
  title  = {Time-series Random Process Complexity Ranking Using a Bound on Conditional Differential Entropy},
  author = {Jacob Ayers and Richard Hahnloser and Julia Ulrich and Lothar Sebastian Krapp and Remo Nitschke and Sabine Stoll and Balthasar Bickel and Reinhard Furrer},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20551},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

7 pages, 4 figures

R2 v1 2026-07-01T07:02:08.388Z