English

Tight Quantum Lower Bound for Approximate Counting with Quantum States

Quantum Physics 2024-05-08 v2

Abstract

We prove tight lower bounds for the following variant of the counting problem considered by Aaronson, Kothari, Kretschmer, and Thaler (2020). The task is to distinguish whether an input set x[n]x\subseteq [n] has size either kk or k=(1+ε)kk'=(1+\varepsilon)k. We assume the algorithm has access to * the membership oracle, which, for each i[n]i\in [n], can answer whether ixi\in x, or not; and \item the uniform superposition ψx=ixi/x|\psi_x\rangle = \sum_{i\in x} |i\rangle/\sqrt{|x|} over the elements of xx. Moreover, we consider three different ways how the algorithm can access this state: - the algorithm can have copies of the state ψx|\psi_x\rangle; - the algorithm can execute the reflecting oracle which reflects about the state ψx|\psi_x\rangle; - the algorithm can execute the state-generating oracle (or its inverse) which performs the transformation 0ψx|0\rangle\mapsto|\psi_x\rangle. Without the second type of resources (the ones related to ψx|\psi_x\rangle), the problem is well-understood. The study of the problem with the second type of resources was recently initiated by Aaronson et al. We completely resolve the problem for all values of 1/kε11/k \le \varepsilon\le 1, giving tight trade-offs between all types of resources available to the algorithm. We also demonstrate that our lower bounds are tight. Thus, we close the main open problems from Aaronson et al. The lower bounds are proven using variants of the adversary bound from Belovs (2015) and employing representation theory of the symmetric group applied to the SnS_n-modules C([n]k)\mathbb{C}^{\binom{[n]}k} and C([n]k)C\mathbb{C}^{\binom{[n]}k}\otimes \mathbb{C}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2002.06879,
  title  = {Tight Quantum Lower Bound for Approximate Counting with Quantum States},
  author = {Aleksandrs Belovs and Ansis Rosmanis},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06879},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

46 pages, 1 figure. The paper was substantially rewritten and clarified, a different simpler approach to the representation theory was used

R2 v1 2026-06-23T13:43:44.771Z