English

The definability of $\mathbb{E}$ in self-iterable mice

Logic 2019-03-20 v2

Abstract

Let MM be a fine structural mouse and let FMF\in M be such that MM\models``FF is a total extender'' and (Mlh(F),F)(M||\mathrm{lh}(F),F) is a premouse. We show that it follows that FEMF\in\mathbb{E}^M, where EM\mathbb{E}^M is the extender sequence of MM. We also prove generalizations of this fact. Let MM be a premouse with no largest cardinal and let Σ\Sigma be a sufficient iteration strategy for MM. We prove that if MM knows enough of ΣM\Sigma\upharpoonright M then EM\mathbb{E}^M is definable over the universe M\lfloor M\rfloor of MM, so if also MZFC\lfloor M\rfloor\models\mathrm{ZFC} then M\lfloor M\rfloor\models``V=HODV=\mathrm{HOD}''. We show that this result applies in particular to M=MntλM=M_{\mathrm{nt}}|\lambda, where MntM_{\mathrm{nt}} is the least non-tame mouse and λ\lambda is any limit cardinal of MntM_{\mathrm{nt}}. We also show that there is no iterable bicephalus (N,E,F)(N,E,F) for which EE is type 22 and FF is type 11 or 33. As a corollary, we deduce a uniqueness property for maximal L[E]L[\mathbb{E}] constructions computed in iterable background universes.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1412.0085,
  title  = {The definability of $\mathbb{E}$ in self-iterable mice},
  author = {Farmer Schlutzenberg},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.0085},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

72 pages. Theorem 4.9 is corrected version of what was Theorem 4.5 in version 1, which contained errors. See 4.10, 4.13 for details. Also includes corrections to some other smaller errors

R2 v1 2026-06-22T07:15:39.723Z