English

The Champernowne constant is not Poissonian

Number Theory 2019-08-05 v2

Abstract

We say that a sequence (xn)nN(x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} in [0,1)[0,1) has Poissonian pair correlations if \begin{equation*} \lim_{N \to \infty} \frac{1}{N} \# \lbrace 1 \leq l \neq m \leq N: \| x_l - x_m \| \leq \frac{s}{N} \rbrace = 2s \end{equation*} for every s0s \geq 0. In this note we study the pair correlation statistics for the sequence of shifts of α\alpha, xn={2nα}, n=1,2,3,x_n = \lbrace 2^n \alpha \rbrace, \ n=1, 2, 3, \ldots, where we choose α\alpha as the Champernowne constant in base 22. Throughout this article {}\lbrace \cdot \rbrace denotes the fractional part of a real number. It is well known that (xn)nN(x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} has Poissonian pair correlations for almost all normal numbers α\alpha (in the sense of Lebesgue), but we will show that it does not have this property for all normal numbers α\alpha, as it fails to be Poissonian for the Champernowne constant.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1710.09313,
  title  = {The Champernowne constant is not Poissonian},
  author = {Ísabel Pirsic and Wolfgang Stockinger},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09313},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

11 pages, several corrections and changes

R2 v1 2026-06-22T22:25:33.835Z