The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. II: Isolated Disk Test
Abstract
Using an isolated Milky Way-mass galaxy simulation, we compare results from 9 state-of-the-art gravito-hydrodynamics codes widely used in the numerical community. We utilize the infrastructure we have built for the AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. This includes the common disk initial conditions, common physics models (e.g., radiative cooling and UV background by the standardized package Grackle) and common analysis toolkit yt, all of which are publicly available. Subgrid physics models such as Jeans pressure floor, star formation, supernova feedback energy, and metal production are carefully constrained across code platforms. With numerical accuracy that resolves the disk scale height, we find that the codes overall agree well with one another in many dimensions including: gas and stellar surface densities, rotation curves, velocity dispersions, density and temperature distribution functions, disk vertical heights, stellar clumps, star formation rates, and Kennicutt-Schmidt relations. Quantities such as velocity dispersions are very robust (agreement within a few tens of percent at all radii) while measures like newly-formed stellar clump mass functions show more significant variation (difference by up to a factor of ~3). Systematic differences exist, for example, between mesh-based and particle-based codes in the low density region, and between more diffusive and less diffusive schemes in the high density tail of the density distribution. Yet intrinsic code differences are generally small compared to the variations in numerical implementations of the common subgrid physics such as supernova feedback. Our experiment reassures that, if adequately designed in accordance with our proposed common parameters, results of a modern high-resolution galaxy formation simulation are more sensitive to input physics than to intrinsic differences in numerical schemes.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1610.03066,
title = {The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. II: Isolated Disk Test},
author = {Ji-hoon Kim and Oscar Agertz and Romain Teyssier and Michael J. Butler and Daniel Ceverino and Jun-Hwan Choi and Robert Feldmann and Ben W. Keller and Alessandro Lupi and Thomas Quinn and Yves Revaz and Spencer Wallace and Nickolay Y. Gnedin and Samuel N. Leitner and Sijing Shen and Britton D. Smith and Robert Thompson and Matthew J. Turk and Tom Abel and Kenza S. Arraki and Samantha M. Benincasa and Sukanya Chakrabarti and Colin DeGraf and Avishai Dekel and Nathan J. Goldbaum and Philip F. Hopkins and Cameron B. Hummels and Anatoly Klypin and Hui Li and Piero Madau and Nir Mandelker and Lucio Mayer and Kentaro Nagamine and Sarah Nickerson and Brian W. O'Shea and Joel R. Primack and Santi Roca-Fàbrega and Vadim Semenov and Ikkoh Shimizu and Christine M. Simpson and Keita Todoroki and James W. Wadsley and John H. Wise},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03066},
year = {2019}
}
Comments
28 pages, 35 figures, Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal, Image resolution greatly reduced, High-resolution version of this article is available at http://www.jihoonkim.org/agora/AGORA_Paper4_draft.pdf, The first paper of the AGORA Initiative is at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..210...14K, More information on AGORA is at http://www.AGORAsimulations.org/