English

Stability, cohomology vanishing, and non-approximable groups

Group Theory 2018-02-16 v2 Functional Analysis

Abstract

Several well-known open questions (such as: are all groups sofic/hyperlinear?) have a common form: can all groups be approximated by asymptotic homomorphisms into the symmetric groups Sym(n)\mathrm{Sym}(n) (in the sofic case) or the finite dimensional unitary groups U(n){\rm U}(n) (in the hyperlinear case)? In the case of U(n){\rm U}(n), the question can be asked with respect to different metrics and norms. This paper answers, for the first time, one of these versions, showing that there exist fintely presented groups which are not approximated by U(n){\rm U}(n) with respect to the Frobenius norm TFrob=i,j=1nTij2,T=[Tij]i,j=1nMn(C)\|T\|_{\rm{Frob}}=\sqrt{\sum_{i,j=1}^n|T_{ij}|^2},T=[T_{ij}]_{i,j=1}^n\in\mathrm{M}_n(\mathbb C). Our strategy is to show that some higher dimensional cohomology vanishing phenomena implies stability, that is, every Frobenius-approximate homomorphism into finite-dimensional unitary groups is close to an actual homomorphism. This is combined with existence results of certain non-residually finite central extensions of lattices in some simple pp-adic Lie groups. These groups act on high rank Bruhat-Tits buildings and satisfy the needed vanishing cohomology phenomenon and are thus stable and not Frobenius-approximated.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1711.10238,
  title  = {Stability, cohomology vanishing, and non-approximable groups},
  author = {Marcus De Chiffre and Lev Glebsky and Alex Lubotzky and Andreas Thom},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10238},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

33 pages, no figures; v2 includes new section with a more conceptual explanation of the main technique and more references

R2 v1 2026-06-22T22:59:16.479Z