English

Snakes and Ladders: a Treewidth Story

Combinatorics 2024-01-31 v2 Data Structures and Algorithms Populations and Evolution

Abstract

Let GG be an undirected graph. We say that GG contains a ladder of length kk if the 2×(k+1)2 \times (k+1) grid graph is an induced subgraph of GG that is only connected to the rest of GG via its four cornerpoints. We prove that if all the ladders contained in GG are reduced to length 4, the treewidth remains unchanged (and that this bound is tight). Our result indicates that, when computing the treewidth of a graph, long ladders can simply be reduced, and that minimal forbidden minors for bounded treewidth graphs cannot contain long ladders. Our result also settles an open problem from algorithmic phylogenetics: the common chain reduction rule, used to simplify the comparison of two evolutionary trees, is treewidth-preserving in the display graph of the two trees.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2302.10662,
  title  = {Snakes and Ladders: a Treewidth Story},
  author = {Steven Chaplick and Steven Kelk and Ruben Meuwese and Matus Mihalak and Georgios Stamoulis},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10662},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

Compared to the earlier arXiv/WG version we have added analytical (as opposed to empirical) tightness bounds, and an extended discussion. See also Authors note 2 at the end of the introduction about earlier work in this area by Marchand et al

R2 v1 2026-06-28T08:45:33.818Z