Sign Changes of the Liouville function on quadratics
Abstract
Let denote the Liouville function. Complementary to the prime number theorem, Chowla conjectured that \vspace{1mm} \noindent {\bf Conjecture (Chowla).} {\em \begin{equation} \label{a.1} \sum_{n\le x} \lambda (f(n)) =o(x) \end{equation} for any polynomial with integer coefficients which is not of form . } \vspace{1mm} \noindent The prime number theorem is equivalent to \eqref{a.1} when . Chowla's conjecture is proved for linear functions but for the degree greater than 1, the conjecture seems to be extremely hard and still remains wide open. One can consider a weaker form of Chowla's conjecture, namely, \vspace{1mm} \noindent {\bf Conjecture 1 (Cassaigne, et al).} {\em If and is not in the form of for some , then changes sign infinitely often.} Clearly, Chowla's conjecture implies Conjecture 1. Although it is weaker, Conjecture 1 is still wide open for polynomials of degree . In this article, we study Conjecture 1 for the quadratic polynomials. One of our main theorems is {\bf Theorem 1.} {\em Let with and be a positive integer such that is not a perfect square. Then if the equation has one solution , then it has infinitely many positive solutions .} As a direct consequence of Theorem 1, we prove some partial results of Conjecture 1 for quadratic polynomials are also proved by using Theorem 1.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1109.3107,
title = {Sign Changes of the Liouville function on quadratics},
author = {Peter Borwein and Stephen K. K. Choi and Himadri Ganguli},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.3107},
year = {2019}
}