Sets avoiding $p$-term arithmetic progressions in ${\mathbb Z}_{q}^n$ are exponentially small
Number Theory
2020-12-18 v2 Combinatorics
Abstract
Pach and Palincza proved the following generalization of Ellenberg and Gijswijt's bound for the size of -term arithmetic progression-free subsets, where : Let be an integer such that divides and let . Then if is sufficiently large. Building on the proof technique of Pach and Palincza's upper bound we generalize the Ellenberg and Gijswijt's bound in the following way: Let be any integer and let be a prime. Suppose that . Then the there exists an integer and a real number such that for each .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2012.08426,
title = {Sets avoiding $p$-term arithmetic progressions in ${\mathbb Z}_{q}^n$ are exponentially small},
author = {Gábor Hegedüs},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08426},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
there is a fatal error in the proof of Lemma 1.9