While off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are sample efficient due to gradient-based updates and data reuse in the replay buffer, they struggle with convergence to local optima due to limited exploration. On the other hand, population-based algorithms offer a natural exploration strategy, but their heuristic black-box operators are inefficient. Recent algorithms have integrated these two methods, connecting them through a shared replay buffer. However, the effect of using diverse data from population optimization iterations on off-policy RL algorithms has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we first analyze the use of off-policy RL algorithms in combination with population-based algorithms, showing that the use of population data could introduce an overlooked error and harm performance. To test this, we propose a uniform and scalable training design and conduct experiments on our tailored framework in robot locomotion tasks from the OpenAI gym. Our results substantiate that using population data in off-policy RL can cause instability during training and even degrade performance. To remedy this issue, we further propose a double replay buffer design that provides more on-policy data and show its effectiveness through experiments. Our results offer practical insights for training these hybrid methods.