English

Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment

High Energy Physics - Theory 2009-10-28 v1

Abstract

We show that the argument in Phys Rev Lett 70 (1993) 1360 is correct and consistent, and that Hagen & Sudarshan's solution has inconsistency leading to non-vanishing commutators of [P1,P2][P^1, P^2] and [Pj,H][P^j, H] even in physical states. This proves that many of HS's statements in their Comment are based merely on incorrect guess, but not on careful algebra.

Cite

@article{arxiv.hep-th/9403156,
  title  = {Reply to Hagen & Sudarshan's Comment},
  author = {C. L. Ho and Y. Hosotani},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-th/9403156},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

one page, UMN-TH-1245/94

R2 v1 2026-07-22T15:49:27.190Z