English

Relativizing Small Complexity Classes and their Theories

Computational Complexity 2012-04-26 v1

Abstract

Existing definitions of the relativizations of \NCOne, \L\ and \NL\ do not preserve the inclusions \NCOne\L\NCOne \subseteq \L, \NL\ACOne\NL\subseteq \ACOne. We start by giving the first definitions that preserve them. Here for \L\ and \NL\ we define their relativizations using Wilson's stack oracle model, but limit the height of the stack to a constant (instead of log(n)\log(n)). We show that the collapse of any two classes in {\ACZm,\TCZ,\NCOne,\L,\NL}\{\ACZm, \TCZ, \NCOne, \L, \NL\} implies the collapse of their relativizations. Next we exhibit an oracle α\alpha that makes \ACk(α)\ACk(\alpha) a proper hierarchy. This strengthens and clarifies the separations of the relativized theories in [Takeuti, 1995]. The idea is that a circuit whose nested depth of oracle gates is bounded by kk cannot compute correctly the (k+1)(k+1) compositions of every oracle function. Finally we develop theories that characterize the relativizations of subclasses of \Ptime\ by modifying theories previously defined by the second two authors. A function is provably total in a theory iff it is in the corresponding relativized class, and hence the oracle separations imply separations for the relativized theories.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1204.5508,
  title  = {Relativizing Small Complexity Classes and their Theories},
  author = {Klaus Aehlig and Stephen Cook and Phuong Nguyen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.5508},
  year   = {2012}
}

Comments

28 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-21T20:54:18.768Z