English

Redshift distortions of galaxy correlation functions

Astrophysics 2008-11-26 v1

Abstract

To examine how peculiar velocities can affect the 2-, 3-, and 4-point redshift correlation functions, we evaluate volume-average correlations for configurations that emphasize and minimize redshift distortions for four different volume-limited samples from each of the CfA, SSRS, and IRAS redshift catalogs. We find a characteristic distortion for the 2-point correlation, \xibar2\xibar_2: the slope γ\gamma is flatter and the correlation length is larger in redshift space than in real space; that is, redshift distortions ``move'' correlations from small to large scales. At the largest scales (up to 12\Mpc12 \Mpc), the extra power in the redshift distribution is compatible with Ω4/7/b1\Omega^{4/7}/b \approx 1. We estimate Ω4/7/b\Omega^{4/7}/b to be 0.53±0.150.53 \pm 0.15, 1.10±0.161.10 \pm 0.16 and 0.84±0.450.84 \pm 0.45 for the CfA, SSRS and IRAS catalogs. Higher order correlations \xibar3\xibar_3 and \xibar4\xibar_4 suffer similar redshift distortions, but in such a way that, within the accuracy of our analysis, the normalized amplitudes S3S_3 and S4S_4 are insensitive to this effect. The hierarchical amplitudes S3S_3 and S4S_4 are constant as a function of scale between 1--12\Mpc12 \Mpc and have similar values in all samples and catalogues, S32S_3 \approx 2 and S46S_4 \approx 6, despite the fact that \xibar2\xibar_2, \xibar3\xibar_3, and \xibar4\xibar_4 differ from one sample to another by large factors (up to a factor of 4 in \xibar2\xibar_2, 8 for \xibar3\xibar_3, and 12 for \xibar4\xibar_4). The agreement between the independent estimations of S3S_3 and S4S_4

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/9305032,
  title  = {Redshift distortions of galaxy correlation functions},
  author = {J. N. Fry and Enrique Gaztanaga},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/9305032},
  year   = {2008}
}

Comments

20 pages (12 figues available on request), LaTeX, FERMILAB-Pub-93-097-A

R2 v1 2026-07-22T09:22:40.107Z