Reasoning about Social Choice and Games in Monadic Fixed-Point Logic
Abstract
Whether it be in normal form games, or in fair allocations, or in voter preferences in voting systems, a certain pattern of reasoning is common. From a particular profile, an agent or a group of agents may have an incentive to shift to a new one. This induces a natural graph structure that we call the improvement graph on the strategy space of these systems. We suggest that the monadic fixed-point logic with counting, an extension of monadic first-order logic on graphs with fixed-point and counting quantifiers, is a natural specification language on improvement graphs, and thus for a class of properties that can be interpreted across these domains. The logic has an efficient model checking algorithm (in the size of the improvement graph).
Cite
@article{arxiv.1907.09100,
title = {Reasoning about Social Choice and Games in Monadic Fixed-Point Logic},
author = {Ramit Das and R. Ramanujam and Sunil Simon},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09100},
year = {2019}
}
Comments
In Proceedings TARK 2019, arXiv:1907.08335