English

Quantum Communication-Query Tradeoffs

Computational Complexity 2017-09-07 v4 Quantum Physics

Abstract

For any function f:X×YZf: X \times Y \to Z, we prove that Qcc(f)QOIP(f)(logQOIP(f)+logZ)Ω(logX)Q^{*\text{cc}}(f) \cdot Q^{\text{OIP}}(f) \cdot (\log Q^{\text{OIP}}(f) + \log |Z|) \geq \Omega(\log |X|). Here, Qcc(f)Q^{*\text{cc}}(f) denotes the bounded-error communication complexity of ff using an entanglement-assisted two-way qubit channel, and QOIP(f)Q^{\text{OIP}}(f) denotes the number of quantum queries needed to learn xx with high probability given oracle access to the function fx(y)=deff(x,y)f_x(y) \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} f(x, y). We show that this tradeoff is close to the best possible. We also give a generalization of this tradeoff for distributional query complexity. As an application, we prove an optimal Ω(logq)\Omega(\log q) lower bound on the QccQ^{*\text{cc}} complexity of determining whether x+yx + y is a perfect square, where Alice holds xFqx \in \mathbf{F}_q, Bob holds yFqy \in \mathbf{F}_q, and Fq\mathbf{F}_q is a finite field of odd characteristic. As another application, we give a new, simpler proof that searching an ordered size-NN database requires Ω(logN/loglogN)\Omega(\log N / \log \log N) quantum queries. (It was already known that Θ(logN)\Theta(\log N) queries are required.)

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.07768,
  title  = {Quantum Communication-Query Tradeoffs},
  author = {William M. Hoza},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07768},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

20 pages, 3 figures. Strengthened the results in Section 5, fixed small mistakes, improved presentation

R2 v1 2026-06-22T18:54:02.328Z