English

Proximity results and faster algorithms for Integer Programming using the Steinitz Lemma

Discrete Mathematics 2019-06-10 v3

Abstract

We consider integer programming problems in standard form max{cTx:Ax=b,x0,xZn}\max \{c^Tx : Ax = b, \, x\geq 0, \, x \in Z^n\} where AZm×nA \in Z^{m \times n}, bZmb \in Z^m and cZnc \in Z^n. We show that such an integer program can be solved in time (mΔ)O(m)b2(m \Delta)^{O(m)} \cdot \|b\|_\infty^2, where Δ\Delta is an upper bound on each absolute value of an entry in AA. This improves upon the longstanding best bound of Papadimitriou (1981) of (mΔ)O(m2)(m\cdot \Delta)^{O(m^2)}, where in addition, the absolute values of the entries of bb also need to be bounded by Δ\Delta. Our result relies on a lemma of Steinitz that states that a set of vectors in RmR^m that is contained in the unit ball of a norm and that sum up to zero can be ordered such that all partial sums are of norm bounded by mm. We also use the Steinitz lemma to show that the 1\ell_1-distance of an optimal integer and fractional solution, also under the presence of upper bounds on the variables, is bounded by m(2mΔ+1)mm \cdot (2\,m \cdot \Delta+1)^m. Here Δ\Delta is again an upper bound on the absolute values of the entries of AA. The novel strength of our bound is that it is independent of nn. We provide evidence for the significance of our bound by applying it to general knapsack problems where we obtain structural and algorithmic results that improve upon the recent literature.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1707.00481,
  title  = {Proximity results and faster algorithms for Integer Programming using the Steinitz Lemma},
  author = {Friedrich Eisenbrand and Robert Weismantel},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00481},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

We achieve much milder dependence of the running time on the largest entry in $b$

R2 v1 2026-06-22T20:36:07.019Z