English

Probabilistic lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices

Combinatorics 2016-11-02 v7

Abstract

Let D(n){\mathcal D}(n) be the maximal determinant for n×nn \times n {±1}\{\pm 1\}-matrices, and R(n)=D(n)/nn/2\mathcal R(n) = {\mathcal D}(n)/n^{n/2} be the ratio of D(n){\mathcal D}(n) to the Hadamard upper bound. Using the probabilistic method, we prove new lower bounds on D(n){\mathcal D}(n) and R(n)\mathcal R(n) in terms of d=nhd = n-h, where hh is the order of a Hadamard matrix and hh is maximal subject to hnh \le n. For example, R(n)>(πe/2)d/2\mathcal R(n) > (\pi e/2)^{-d/2} if 1d31 \le d \le 3, and R(n)>(πe/2)d/2(1d2(π/(2h))1/2)\mathcal R(n) > (\pi e/2)^{-d/2}(1 - d^2(\pi/(2h))^{1/2}) if d>3d > 3. By a recent result of Livinskyi, d2/h1/20d^2/h^{1/2} \to 0 as nn \to \infty, so the second bound is close to (πe/2)d/2(\pi e/2)^{-d/2} for large nn. Previous lower bounds tended to zero as nn \to \infty with dd fixed, except in the cases d{0,1}d \in \{0,1\}. For d2d \ge 2, our bounds are better for all sufficiently large nn. If the Hadamard conjecture is true, then d3d \le 3, so the first bound above shows that R(n)\mathcal R(n) is bounded below by a positive constant (πe/2)3/2>0.1133(\pi e/2)^{-3/2} > 0.1133.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1501.06235,
  title  = {Probabilistic lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices},
  author = {Richard P. Brent and Judy-anne H. Osborn and Warren D. Smith},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.06235},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

17 pages, 2 tables, 24 references. Shorter version of arXiv:1402.6817v4. Typos corrected in v2 and v3, new Lemma 7 in v4, updated references in v5, added Remark 2.8 and a reference in v6, updated references in v7

R2 v1 2026-06-22T08:12:32.737Z