English

Polynomial Bounds in the Apex Minor Theorem

Combinatorics 2025-03-07 v1 Discrete Mathematics

Abstract

A graph AA is "apex" if AzA-z is planar for some vertex zV(A)z\in V(A). Eppstein [Algorithmica, 2000] showed that for a minor-closed class G\mathcal{G}, the graphs in G\mathcal{G} with bounded radius have bounded treewidth if and only if some apex graph is not in G\mathcal{G}. In particular, for every apex graph AA and integer rr, there is a minimum integer g(A,r)g(A,r) such that every AA-minor-free graph with radius rr has treewidth at most g(A,r)g(A,r). We show that if t=V(A)t=|V(A)| then g(A,r)O(r9t18)g(A,r)\in O^\ast(r^9t^{18}) which is the first upper bound on g(A,r)g(A,r) with polynomial dependence on both rr and tt. More precisely, we show that every AA-minor-free graph with radius rr has no 16rt2×16rt216rt^2 \times 16rt^2 grid minor, which implies the first result via the Polynomial Grid Minor Theorem. A key example of an apex graph is the complete bipartite graph K3,tK_{3,t}, since K3,tK_{3,t}-minor-free graphs include and generalise graphs embeddable in any fixed surface. In this case, we prove that every K3,tK_{3,t}-minor-free graph with radius rr has no 4r(1+t)×4r(1+t)4r(1+\sqrt{t})\times 4r(1+\sqrt{t}) grid minor, which is tight up to a constant factor.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2503.04228,
  title  = {Polynomial Bounds in the Apex Minor Theorem},
  author = {Kevin Hendrey and David R. Wood},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04228},
  year   = {2025}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-28T22:08:53.978Z