English

Parameterized Algorithms for Deletion to (r,l)-graphs

Computational Complexity 2015-05-05 v1 Data Structures and Algorithms

Abstract

For fixed integers r,0r,\ell \geq 0, a graph GG is called an {\em (r,)(r,\ell)-graph} if the vertex set V(G)V(G) can be partitioned into rr independent sets and \ell cliques. This brings us to the following natural parameterized questions: {\sc Vertex (r,)(r,\ell)-Partization} and {\sc Edge (r,)(r,\ell)-Partization}. An input to these problems consist of a graph GG and a positive integer kk and the objective is to decide whether there exists a set SV(G)S\subseteq V(G) (SE(G)S\subseteq E(G)) such that the deletion of SS from GG results in an (r,)(r,\ell)-graph. These problems generalize well studied problems such as {\sc Odd Cycle Transversal}, {\sc Edge Odd Cycle Transversal}, {\sc Split Vertex Deletion} and {\sc Split Edge Deletion}. We do not hope to get parameterized algorithms for either {\sc Vertex (r,)(r,\ell)-Partization} or {\sc Edge (r,)(r,\ell)-Partization} when either of rr or \ell is at least 33 as the recognition problem itself is NP-complete. This leaves the case of r,{1,2}r,\ell \in \{1,2\}. We almost complete the parameterized complexity dichotomy for these problems. Only the parameterized complexity of {\sc Edge (2,2)(2,2)-Partization} remains open. We also give an approximation algorithm and a Turing kernelization for {\sc Vertex (r,)(r,\ell)-Partization}. We use an interesting finite forbidden induced graph characterization, for a class of graphs known as (r,)(r,\ell)-split graphs, properly containing the class of (r,)(r,\ell)-graphs. This approach to obtain approximation algorithms could be of an independent interest.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1504.08120,
  title  = {Parameterized Algorithms for Deletion to (r,l)-graphs},
  author = {Sudeshna Kolay and Fahad Panolan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.08120},
  year   = {2015}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T09:25:36.308Z